Thursday, January 24, 2008   RETURN TO TOP

A NEWT ONE-THE TRUTH SURGE
Roberta Dvorak of Canada is yet another wild-eyed, narcissistic pea brain with an appalling grey matter deficiency. She posts meaningless, emotionalized dribble on conservative websites hither and yon because of;
A) her inability to construct a website, blog or message board beyond a 4th grade level.
B) her abject failure at getting anyone to take anything she has to say seriously.
C) her rabid, pathological and irrational hatred for Bush and all persons whose ideology
places them to the political right of Joseph Stalin.

Roberta posts as raoul in the comments section of conservative sites. An apparent slur of Dr. Raoul who, as far as we know, has never done anything to her.

She also appears in the Boston Tea Party chatroom on SFWest as Rubberduh or Ladysput.

She is a serial, congenital liar and will, no doubt, deny these claims, though we have factual proof of their authenticity.

Roberta is, like so many lefties,....well.....she's just nuts.

Observe. Our response in RED.

Now for the real reason why you don't post opposing views -

Strawman. We do post opposing views and never claimed that we wouldn't. What we refrain from posting is wild-eyed, hysterical ad hom nonsense.....which, honestly, is all you ever deliver.

you're a bunch of cowards, plain and simple.

This from the loser who hides behinds proxies and throws stones. Too chickenshit to engage on the issues, you can only cower in your corner and call everyone who disagrees with you a nazi. We have invited you to refute any single point we have made or come on our show. Your selfish, lazy leftist mentality has led you to believe that we owe you a platform for your leftwing mush and ad hom attacks. We don't owe you anything. We don't pretend to desire a level playing field. Our goal is to take left wing swine, such as yourself, and pound you into the dust. Your are the enemy, plain and simple. We don't wish to be your friends and we have no intention of giving your diarrhea of the mouth a false credibility it isn't entitled to. We do not hide our identities. Everyone knows who we are but we are as in your face as ever. You calling us cowards? A bitch of psychological projection Roberta.....and you know it.

You also lie when you say we don't address the issues. It's a matter of what your interpretation of addressing something is.

Nonsense. You don't address the issues, you never have. What you DO is try to recast the issues and re frame the debate. That never works because we are infinitely more intelligent than you and we cannot be spun.

I'll use your own blog to show your utter hypocrisy in that it is YOU that never really address something directly. Yesterday you attacked the article about bush's 900+ lies regarding Iraq.
Did you specifically address the facts about his lying?

This is a fallacy called Circular Reasoning.

The conclusion is found in the premise. Bush lied. How do you know he lied? Because he lied 900 times. This is one that we have been over with you, and other moonbats, at least a thousand times.

For a statement to be proven a lie, you have to prove a number of things.

  1. That the statement was demonstrably, provably false at the time it was made.
  2. That the person making the statement can be proven to have known it's falsity when he made it and made the statement with the deliberate intention to deceive.

To this day, no leftwinger has been able to produce a statement by Bush that meets even the first criteria.....
But we know very well what you are going to do Roberta, don't we.

You will ramble on about how "everyone knows Bush lied" (argumentum ad populum), "only a fascist would deny Bush lied" (argumentum ad hominem) and "You can't prove Bush didn't lie" (Burden of Proof fallacy).

What you won't do is provide any evidence. This is something we both know.

Well you are not addressing the issue, I will. Both the 9/11 and Intel commissions concluded no manipulation of the intel and Clinton appointee Tenant called the WMD case a slam dunk.

Checkmate.

Of course not. Your 2 main points (ther others were lost in the fog of your myopia) were that the article was published by 'nasty lefties' backed by Soros. Hence, it is to be ignored.

So, an article published by Ann Coulter would meet your standards? Don't be a hypocrite. Of course, at least Coulter tells the truth...even if not nicely.

The 2nd point was that it goes too far back in history and should be ignored since, in your rather absurd and irrational view, all of the points were rebutted by neonazis eons ago.

Ahhh....there is the required Ad Hom. Of course, you are too stupid and blind to see how you undercut your own credibility by comparing all who disagree with you as Nazis. You also fail to see the remarkable irony of claiming that we only ban you because we are afraid of those who disagree, then calling me a nazi. So, in your warped, twisted, left-wing sewar dweller logic, if I don't let you come to MY blog and do little more than call me a Nazi on a daily basis, I am somehow afraid of your views.

Afraid? Hardly. In the same way that I am not afraid of screaming toddlers but don't have the desire to stand in a room full of them. You certainly don't get banned because I tremble at the sight of your banal diatribes. You are turned off in the same manner as a staticy radio. There just isn't anything to be gained by listening to someone so hysterical.

Rebutted? Just because a dimwit ignores or disregards a FACT it does not mean the FACT was rebutted.

Circular Reasoning. Just because a bloviating bitch claims that a rabid statement is a fact, doesn't make it one.

This blog, like bush's failing economy, is a sad joke. All you do is deny and attack. You are losers - people living on the fringe of society waiting for Santa Claus, in the form of armageddon to rescue you from your pathetic and quite wasteful lives.

and yet, here you are, hour after hour, day after blessed day, hanging tensely on every single syllable. This would make you one hundred times more pathetic than you claim we are.

That may be the fact, of course, but I rather doubt it. My suspicion is that you are genuinely afraid of us. You are wise to be so. The growth of our blog and show and myspace are beyond unreal because we have tapped into an energy. An energy motivated by millions who are sick and tired of trailer trash like you who can do little more than bitch and whine that all of America won't cower in the fetal position in the face of Islamic terror.

You have called us both 'pathetic' and 'dangerous'. Which is it, bitch? We can't be both

Take my advice ya little strumpet, go with dangerous.

Being led by the equally pathetic boston who is clueless regarding the true nature of Christ is no surprise.

First of all, Pastor Boston doesn't lead us....but you know as well as I do that you will not name the doctrinal infraction you imply he is guilty of. You know it, I know it.

You all fit exactly in the description given by the author of the book, The New fascists. Now I can't wait for the barrage to come my way. ha ha ha..

Well, well, well...here we are at the end of another rambling Roberta diatribe and there is no views expressed, no points to be countered, no factual backup...no cogent thought of any kind.

....who is surprised?
|




RECENT COMMENTS

RETURN TO TOP

A Newt One's Permanent Archive June-December 2007
December 2007