Thursday, May 15, 2008   Return to top
A NEWT ONE-THE TRUTH SURGE
Jeffrey Goldberg's interview with Senator Barack Hussein Obama raised some cain with one quote; lets take a closer look. This excerpt comes from The Atlantic.
JG: Do you think that Israel is a drag on America's reputation overseas?

BO: No, no, no. But what I think is that this constant wound, that this constant sore, does infect all of our foreign policy. The lack of a resolution to this problem provides an excuse for anti-American militant jihadists to engage in inexcusable actions, and so we have a national-security interest in solving this, and I also believe that Israel has a security interest in solving this because I believe that the status quo is unsustainable. I am absolutely convinced of that, and some of the tensions that might arise between me and some of the more hawkish elements in the Jewish community in the United States might stem from the fact that I'm not going to blindly adhere to whatever the most hawkish position is just because that's the safest ground politically.

I want to solve the problem, and so my job in being a friend to Israel is partly to hold up a mirror and tell the truth and say if Israel is building settlements without any regard to the effects that this has on the peace process, then we're going to be stuck in the same status quo that we've been stuck in for decades now, and that won't lift that existential dread that David Grossman described in your article.

The notion that a vibrant, successful society with incredible economic growth and incredible cultural vitality is still plagued by this notion that this could all end at any moment -- you know, I don't know what that feels like, but I can use my imagination to understand it. I would not want to raise my children in those circumstances. I want to make sure that the people of Israel, when they kiss their kids and put them on that bus, feel at least no more existential dread than any parent does whenever their kids leave their sight. So that then becomes the question: is settlement policy conducive to relieving that over the long term, or is it just making the situation worse? That's the question that has to be asked.

  • this constant wound, that this constant sore
Since 1948 Muslims have been constantly attacking Israel. Who is to blame for that? What is Israel's offense, beyond existing? The Ottoman Empire lost the Levant in WW1, fair and square. They sided with the aggressors and they lost. Get over it! The Arab League invaded Israel in 1967 and they lost, losing territory which they snatched from Israel in 1948, territory from which they attacked her in 1967. Why should Israel not live on land she recovered from aggressors??
  • The lack of a resolution to this problem provides an excuse for anti-American militant jihadists to engage in inexcusable actions
The problem: Islam's Hellbent determination to commit policide & genocide. Do pro-American militant jihadists exist? Why then is it necessary to attach the qualifier?
  • I also believe that Israel has a security interest in solving this
Israel has an interest in not being constantly under attack? Unthinkable!! When you are under constant attack by an aggressor Hellbent on your destruction, how do you solve that problem? This question requires common sense, not a Harvard Law Degree.

The interview also included the idiotic quote about HAMAS. Lets review that gem of idiocy.

JG: Why do you think Ahmed Yousef of Hamas said what he said about you?

  • BO: My position on Hamas is indistinguishable from the position of Hillary Clinton or John McCain. I said they are a terrorist organization and I've repeatedly condemned them. I've repeatedly said, and I mean what I say: since they are a terrorist organization, we should not be dealing with them until they recognize Israel, renounce terrorism, and abide by previous agreements.
  • they are a terrorist organization
Meaning what, exactly? They are aggressors who attack non-combatants, inflicting terror for the purpose of forcing submission. They are Muslims; Muhammad is their model: what the Hell do you expect?

  • since they are a terrorist organization, we should not be dealing with them until they recognize Israel, renounce terrorism
If they did not attack women & children; did not engage in terrorism, we should "deal with them" without preconditions--why, exactly?

  • recognize Israel
What damn fool expects Muslims to recognize Israel? Only a damn fool who has not read their Charter.
  • renounce terrorism
What damn fool expects Muslims to renounce terrorism? Only a damn fool who has not read the Qur'an & Hadith.
  • We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve [3:151]
  • I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes [8:12]
  • Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. [33:26]
  • I have been made victorious with terror [Bukhari4.52.220]
Why did Muslims invade Israel in 638? Does Obama know or care?
  • Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. [9:29]
  • It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. ...Go to Syria, for it is Allah's chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people. [Abu Dawud 14.2477 ]
Why must they persist in reconquering Israel? Because Israel disproves Allah's promise of victory, proving Allah to be an impotent idol.
  • If there are twenty steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve [8:65]
  • We will indeed make victorious Our Messengers [40:51]
  • See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.[13:41]
Israel will not know peace while Islam exists. Neither will America. We must nominate and elect leaders who comprehend this fatal fact of Islam and have the will to eliminate it. Peace results from victory, not from appeasement.

Labels: , ,

|




RECENT COMMENTS

RETURN TO TOP

A Newt One's Permanent Archive June-December 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008