The Pathetic and Cowering and Spineless Left

As most of you know, every blog has their rezident koward moonbat and they are always and forever all mouth and no spine.

Recently, one was flushed from our Patriots For Conservative Values Group and IT has gone whining to other forums and blogs "telling on us"...LMAO!! I wonder if IT wears the colors of the cowards I saw this past weekend in DC...yellow, pink and purple.

Anyway, we normally don't give IT much credence and/or attention but the poor thing is just too easy to trounce. IT has an air of self-imagery that IT excels in some sort of morphed intelligence but all IT does is show its propensity for the delusional aspects of life. Everything is a conspiracy and everyone is out to get IT. I suppose paranoia is a good thing to have when the entire world thinks one is a complete fool, ergo, Ron Paul supporters.

IT recently went whining to several "underground" sites (much closer to hell that way, you see) and commenced to whine and prattle on as would a spoiled and only brat-child tends to do. If IT wasn't so pathetically insane, IT would be funny. I have no pity for the fool, just contempt towards ITS ignorance and childish demeanor.

IT has said before that IT wasn't a Democrat. If so, why did IT go here to whine?

IT has said before that IT wasn't a "Troofer". If so, why did IT go here to whine?

It went to other places to whine as well but all IT did was create more hits to our blogs and since then, we have had some converts. Imagine that.

A Newt One, posted a comment to our Group and I will place it here for all to see. It reveals how the Leftinistra delude themselves and expose their own cowardice and their inability to discern from opinion and facts.

I WASN'T GOING TO RESPOND TO THIS EMOTIONALISTIC DRIVEL.....

....but what the heck. It is, after all, a textbook example of how the left attempts to 'argue' their points. Pastor Ed sent this to me in an e-mail. Some coward from the (ironically named) site Peace Takes Courage launched this invective against myself and 4 of my friends on the web.

For the past year I've been tangling with some of the most dangerous rightwing neocons I've ever met. And that's saying a lot because I've been debating/fighting with them for over 6 years. The following blog sites are 5 of the most radical ones I've been involved with. Most of the people on these blogs claim to be Christian fundamentalist patriots. I call them neo nazis because their comments and actions are no better than those of the 3rd Reich. You can wander over there and check it out for yourselves.

In debating circles, this is your classic meaningless statement fallacy......an intellectual sucker punch, if you will. He attempts to land a smear that the opponent doesn't respond to because there is nothing factual that can be responded to. A meaningless statement is a statement which posits nothing of substance which can be agreed or disagreed with. In the context of logical fallacies, the inclusion of a meaningless statement in the premises of the argument will undermine the validity of the argument since the premise can neither be confirmed or falsified.

It can be difficult to prove that a statement is meaningless because such statements are often offered in bad faith. Let's count how many hysterical, wholly unsubstantiated claims the writer makes.

1. For the past year I've been tangling with some of the most dangerous right wing neocons I've ever met.

Examples? Examples would be very valuable in establishing context. If this person could show us some of these people he has 'tangled with', how exactly he has 'tangled with' them, or how, specifically, they are dangerous. It would be helpful to provide objective criteria for establishing someone as 'right wing' or a 'neocon' and then demonstrate, point by point, how these individuals meet that criteria. This seems to me to be an essential element to this statement because it forms (as you will clearly see) the premise upon which his whole argument is based.

2. And that's saying a lot because I've been debating/fighting with them for over 6 years.

Again, meaningless, because we still haven't established who they are so the reader never gets the opportunity to examine the views of the people to determine if the writer's assessments are accurate.

3. The following blog sites are 5 of the most radical ones I've been involved with.

The statements get ever more meaningless as the writer goes further and further out on the branch. We do not have any clue of what this writer terms as radical, or who are the 'many' radical people he has encountered. Thus, to say these five are among the most radical is empty hyperbole because the writer has made no attempt to define what radical is.

It would be like me saying that I have seen wizzily widgets before but, in my whole life, I have never seen widgets more wizzily than those widgets. Without context of what a wizzily widget is, the statement is utterly meaningless. Yet, he is stupid enough to continue.

4. Most of the people on these blogs claim to be Christian fundamentalist patriots.

This is what we call a straw man. That is when the writer invents a position, assigns it to his adversary and then attacks the created position, rather than his adversaries actual position.

I am not aware of any of the members of these blogs who would classify themselves as Christian Fundamentalists. Miss Beth and Myself are Roman Catholics, Cyber Pastor and Jimmy Z are Evangelicals and Darter45 is an agnostic.

As far as I know, all of us who do follow the Bible, see it as a very complex set of documents with broad and diverse literary forms. Some teachings are historical, some metaphorical, poetic, prophetic, symbolic.

I don't think a single one of us could be accurately described as fundamentalists, much less, as the writer alleges, apply the label to ourselves. This argument is a complete straw man, manufactured from a discombobulated mind of bigotry.

5. I call them neo nazis because their comments and actions are no better than those of the 3rd Reich.

More ludicrous, inflammatory and wholly unsubstantiated hyperbolic vomit. This dork will not even attempt to demonstrate even one (1) view, statement, action, intimation, or statement of support or affirmation, from any of these bloggers, that, in any way, even remotely, resembles a view or action of the third Reich. In the end, he only winds up making himself look like a rabid dork.

6. You can wander over there and check it out for yourselves.

Oh, trust me, they are. People are wandering over by the tens of thousands to our blog and the overwhelming majority love what they see.

Don't be a coward. If you have an argument to make, make it. Only sissies stand on the sidelines and throw stones.

They cannot help but to be cowards. At the Gathering of Eagles Rally called Operation Eagle Justice on the 15th of September and then the Vets For Freedom march on DC on the 18th of September, the moonbats, whenever encountered and engaged could not maintain eye contact. All they could do is chant retarded slogans such as "Healthcare Not Warfare" and something equally asinine as "Bring The Troops Home to Fight Global Warming"...WTF? Has Global Warming attacked us? Friggin' morons.

These same idiots that "care for the troops" and want to "bring the safely home" are the ones that advocate the murder of American Troops.

At our press conference on the 18th, there were 250+ combat troops on the stage and we watched intensely as the code pink-asses unfurled their banners and we were going to do something about the above banner should it had been displayed. They knew it and were too cowardly to display it.

The cops knew it as well because we showed them this picture and we told them what would happen should it be unfurled. Fortunately, it was AWOL.

Better luck next time.

So, remember this...your trolls are boosting your blog's ratings. They give us more exposure to the enemy and at times, the enemy sees the light and converts to sanity, logic and reason.

All they have to do is view the polls they so live by to check the facts of the matter.

Trolls and Leftinistra. Be afraid. Be very afraid. The Black Choppers are monitoring your every move. I have one in my back yard and it is in constant go mode. You cannot hear them, you see. And they cannot be seen for we only fly at night and never on a Full Moon. All one can see is the muzzle flashes of the 25's...(bark-bark-bark-bark)...and "things' vanish from existence for eternity!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Friggin' morons.

Pelosi's Gavel? More Like Pelosi's Grovel

HUGE HT to Wake Up America for this tid-bit.

As evidenced by the verbiage of this complete and total moronic dunderhead, Pelosi, in her infinite holier-than-thou ignorance and stupidity, has just announced to the world that the Lame Stream Media carries more weight than a Battle Commander In The Field. This is the epitome of insult to the men and women of character in the United States Military. This DAV is NOT happy at the moment and as far as I am concerned, if Pelosi's guts were on fire, I would not shove a water hose up her anal aperture to extinguish the raging blaze. I would watch.

In a previous post I made this evening, it is all so apparent that the verbiage therein is absolutely true. The Leftinistra are running scared, and, as I have been shouting from the rooftops since long BEFORE the elections of 2006, when the war became the political football device to lie their way into prominence, the Truth is going to come out and the Leftinistra will do EXACTLY (Zachry) that which they are doing TODAY.

In light of the reports coming out of Iraq by politicians that have visited the area, the Truth that we are winning the war via military action and winning the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people, the Leftinistra which have invested heavily in defeat, are trying in a vain attempt to discredit General Petraeus before he reports in.

The lying Pelosi knows damn well about who is reporting what and to whom and who is writing what to whom and who is going to report to whom. THEY (the Leftinistra) PUT IT INTO THE LAW!! And because they put into the law, knowing damn well that very few will take the time to actually read the damn thing, have decided to ignore that which they have placed into the law.

They (the Leftinistra) are counting on their moonbat base to NOT read it because their base are drones and have no means of which to actually research facts on their own. It is too hard for them.

For the lazy and the ignorant masses, here, in a nutshell are excerpts from HR 2206, the law the Leftinistra wrote and are now ignoring for political gain and defeatist rhetoric and cowardly actions.

Lets get straight to the point here. (Here was the original post)

Let me show you and Hat Tip to Influence Peddler because it was taking me forever to go through each and every word of H.R.2206,U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (Engrossed Amendment as Agreed to by House), to find the portion I had saw when the bill was first passed.

From the Influence Peddler:

It's also worth looking at exactly what Congress has required for September 15. I've written on it before. Here's what Congress passed, and the President signed:

(A) The President shall submit an initial report, in classified and unclassified format, to the Congress, not later than July 15, 2007, assessing the status of each of the specific benchmarks established above, and declaring, in his judgment, whether satisfactory progress toward meeting these benchmarks is, or is not, being achieved.

(B) The President, having consulted with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Commander, Multi-National Forces Iraq, the United States Ambassador to Iraq, and the Commander of U.S. Central Command, will prepare the report and submit the report to Congress.

(C) If the President’s assessment of any of the specific benchmarks established above is unsatisfactory, the President shall include in that report a description of such revisions to the political, economic, regional, and military components of the strategy, as announced by the President on January 10, 2007. In addition, the President shall include in the report, the advisability of implementing such aspects of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, as he deems appropriate.

(D) The President shall submit a second report to the Congress, not later than September 15, 2007, following the same procedures and criteria outlined above.

Is there any lack of clarity as to whom Congress tasked to prepare and submit the report? Anyone surprised that the report is being prepared by the White House, with the input of appropriate officials in Iraq and throughout the Executive Branch?

Now... a couple questions obviously present themselves here.

#1. Did Congress deliberately require the White House/ President to "submit" this report after having "consulted" with "the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Commander, Multi-National Forces Iraq, the United States Ambassador to Iraq, and the Commander of U.S. Central Command", knowing that they could then count on their supporters, such as Think Progress to either lie, claiming surprise this report would be written by the president, OR counting on their supporters to be ignorant enough to not have read the original wording to begin with?

#2. Are the blogs such as Think progress, and the other examples I named, really "acting" surprised and thereby lying to their readers by implying this is new news and it was not what Congress themselves mandated OR did they did not read the original wording of what Congress required ?

Take your pick, are they willfully lying to their readers or are the simply too ignorant to have read the original wording?

Is there another option here I have missed?

Please, enlighten me, if you think there is one.

Be sure to visit Wake Up America's post and read the updates and other data exposing the idiots at Salon, a sad-sacked waste of a rag.

Here are the dunderheads...

The Behind The Times Folks At Salon

I am beginning to surmise that Salon needs to rename themselves to Saloon and they can abbreviate the new name to 'Loon.

The headline of this particular article, to folks that follow current events; for those at 'Loon, that would be for the last two or three months in the year of our Lord (that will drive 'em loony), 2007, is all too telling.

Behold: The waning power of the War Myth

If one was an apologist or a member of the Leftinistra Moonbat Fruit Loop Brigade or a member of Code Pinko Wacko or a member of ANSWER or an individual with the lethal case of Ostrich Syndrome, the title of the piece is correct. But, for the wrong reasons.

I will only use the first paragraph because the rest can be better utilized as recycled toilet paper.

Aug. 28, 2007 | Bush's entire presidency has been propped up by the War Myth. By aggressively presenting himself as a war leader, by wrapping himself in the sacred robes of patriotism, the military and national honor, Bush has taken refuge in the holy of holies, the ultimate sanctuary in American life. He has made criticism of his policies tantamount to criticism of the one institution in American life that is untouchable: the military. He uses the almost 4,000 new crosses in military cemeteries as a talisman against his opponents -- notwithstanding the fact that he is wholly responsible for those crosses.

Let us dissect this ridiculous and poor excuse of "journalism", shall we? Gary Kamiya, strangely reminiscent of a moonbat from another posting as by kmria, has issues with Patriotism and the ability to recognize truth. It surely must be sad to be this individual with such hatred of the President of The United States.

Bush's entire presidency has been propped up by the War Myth.

War Myth? What War Myth? Let me see if I got this "right", as in "correct". We were attacked on 91101. Correct? OBL and his Band of Murdering Thugs, in the name of "allah", stole private property (aircraft owned and operated by private businesses), effectively kidnapped the passengers on board and flew the stolen aircraft into buildings, intentionally, killing themselves and all on board. Another stolen aircraft augured into the ground killing all on board as well. The Merry Band of Murderous Thugs (terrorists), in the name of their god, murdered thousands of innocents. But, this seems to be OK with this...individual. I cannot in good conscience, classify this individual as a man because he has not the markings of one.

I might add that to a terrorist, there are no innocents. Behold, the "metrics" of the Jihadist is as follows:

1. If I kill you, I win.
2. If you kill me, I am a martyr. I win big.
3. There are no innocents in the land of my enemy. If I kill infants, the elderly, pregnant women, even on purpose, I win.
4. When my enemy kills innocent civilians in error, even his own allies condemn him for brutality. I win.
5. When my enemy kills innocent civilians that I purposefully put in harms way, even his own allies condemn him for brutality. I win.

This telling principle is lost on every single moonbat on the face of God's Green Earth.

The OBL Clan, declared war on the United States many moons ago. And, that is a fact. Anyone which denies that fact has zero to no intelligence and has lived an isolated existence. The United States did as close to nothing about it. Oh, we tossed a few million dollars worth of explosive ordinance into some rudimentary targets and accomplished the same as if doing nothing so, what was the point? Showmanship? An attempt to show someone that missiles do fly?

I was always told and instructed that wasting ammunition like that was a Cardinal Sin.

War Myth? Hasn't any of the "contributing idiots" at 'Loon ever read the Iraq Resolution? Knowing that the cowards of 'Loon will not go there to verify, I, Snooper, will again reproduce the Iraq Resolution here. Behold...please take note of KEY dates...

Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver and develop them, and to end its support for international terrorism;

Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program that was much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;

Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;

Whereas in 1998 Congress concluded that Iraq's continuing weapons of mass destruction programs threatened vital United States interests and international peace and security, declared Iraq to be in "material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations" and urged the President "to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations" (Public Law 105-235);

Whereas Iraq both poses a continuing threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region and remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq persists in violating resolutions of the United Nations Security Council by continuing to engage in brutal repression of its civilian population thereby threatening international peace and security in the region, by refusing to release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, including an American serviceman, and by failing to return property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council;

Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;

Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of American citizens;

Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001 underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that would result to the United States and its citizens from such an attack, combine to justify action by the United States to defend itself;

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 authorizes the use of all necessary means to enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 and subsequent relevant resolutions and to compel Iraq to cease certain activities that threaten international peace and security, including the development of weapons of mass destruction and refusal or obstruction of United Nations weapons inspections in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687, repression of its civilian population in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688, and threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations in Iraq in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 949;

Whereas Congress in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1) has authorized the President "to use United States Armed Forces pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) in order to achieve implementation of Security Council Resolutions 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, and 677";

Whereas in December 1991, Congress expressed its sense that it "supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent with the Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1)," that Iraq's repression of its civilian population violates United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 and "constitutes a continuing threat to the peace, security, and stability of the Persian Gulf region," and that Congress, "supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688";

Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act (Public Law 105-338) expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime;

Whereas on September 12, 2002, President Bush committed the United States to "work with the United Nations Security Council to meet our common challenge" posed by Iraq and to "work for the necessary resolutions," while also making clear that "the Security Council resolutions will be enforced, and the just demands of peace and security will be met, or action will be unavoidable";

Whereas the United States is determined to prosecute the war on terrorism and Iraq's ongoing support for international terrorist groups combined with its development of weapons of mass destruction in direct violation of its obligations under the 1991 cease-fire and other United Nations Security Council resolutions make clear that it is in the national security interests of the United States and in furtherance of the war on terrorism that all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions be enforced, including through the use of force if necessary;

Whereas Congress has taken steps to pursue vigorously the war on terrorism through the provision of authorities and funding requested by the President to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001 or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the President and Congress are determined to continue to take all appropriate actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the President has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States, as Congress recognized in the joint resolution on Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40); and

Whereas it is in the national security of the United States to restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region;

Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE.

This joint resolution may be cited as the "Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq".

SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS

The Congress of the United States supports the efforts by the President to--

(a) strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions applicable to Iraq and encourages him in those efforts; and

(b) obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) AUTHORIZATION. The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to

(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and

(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq.

(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION.

In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon there after as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that

(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq, and

(2) acting pursuant to this resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorists attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

(c) WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS. --

(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION. -- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.

(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS. -- Nothing in this resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.

SEC. 4. REPORTS TO CONGRESS

(a) The President shall, at least once every 60 days, submit to the Congress a report on matters relevant to this joint resolution, including actions taken pursuant to the exercise of authority granted in section 2 and the status of planning for efforts that are expected to be required after such actions are completed, including those actions described in section 7 of Public Law 105-338 (the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998).

(b) To the extent that the submission of any report described in subsection (a) coincides with the submission of any other report on matters relevant to this joint resolution otherwise required to be submitted to Congress pursuant to the reporting requirements of Public Law 93-148 (the War Powers Resolution), all such reports may be submitted as a single consolidated report to the Congress.

(c) To the extent that the information required by section 3 of Public Law 102-1 is included in the report required by this section, such report shall be considered as meeting the requirements of section 3 of Public Law 102-1.

War Myth? What War Myth? The war myth of a demented mind such as this...individual at 'Loon? Do these uneducated and uninitiated "individuals" not understand that the Persian Gulf War of 1991 was NEVER OVER and the War In Iraq is the CONTINUATION of that war, because Saddam Hussein WOULD NOT comply with the United Nations Security Counsel Resolutions? What is there to NOT comprehend?

A "cease-fire" is NOT, repeat, NOT an end of a war. Korea is a prime example of that. The DMZ exists because tyhere is a CONSTANT state of war between North and South Korea.

Hello? Anybody listening? Pay attention! Here it comes! The 1991 Persian Gulf War was NEVER over and it isn't over yet!

War Myth? What War Myth?

He uses the almost 4,000 new crosses in military cemeteries as a talisman against his opponents -- notwithstanding the fact that he is wholly responsible for those crosses.

Gary what's-his-face needs a Boot In His Ass. This clown...this idiot from 'Loon has some serious issues. It is apparent that this would-be whatever IT aspires to be, does not realize that ITS verbiage only enables the enemy and if IT does know it, God help IT should our paths cross.

Somehow, some way, GWB gets the blame for past mistakes. Somehow, some way, GWB is to blame for the OBVIOUS failures of the EIGHT YEARS of CLINTON chasing skirts and using cigars as sex toys and couldn't be disturbed at GOLF pleasures to seriously consider National Security matters.

Yes, GWB ordered troops in because that is what Commanders do when required. And those troops know the risks involved when saying "I Do" to the USG. Some join for the free stuff as a service member but these cowards are soon weeded out and they become Senators or would-be Kerry-likes.

Gary what's-his-face, needs a Boot In his Ass.

ATTENTION TO ALL TROLLS, MOONBATS AND LEFTINISTRA!!

And to the Leftinistra...you have had your fun in the sun...and you have once again, failed miserably.

Here is my suggestion to you all, henceforth and forever more...

More Moonbats In Training (MIT) Data

A good friend of mine has a blog at Townhall and after he got a hang of blogging, he moved to Blogspot where more toys can be had.

There is a particular post where a troll imploded with ITS self-righteous stupidity.

My friend is a Man of God and has a congregation in Indiana. Naturally the troll which, by the way, has self-confessed to being "far left of the leftists", which, equates to communism. For verification of that self-admission, one can find that data here and here.

Also, this same troll has "let it slip" in an emotional state of irrationality and not being able to differentiate between right and wrong or good from evil, that IT was also a Jihadi Troll. IT did that on my Word Press blog which, BTW, is now dedicated to exposing Islam and is getting quite popular.

Naturally, a professed communist would be attracted to the Jihadi mindset and vice versa. "Do as we say or we will cut your heads off!" Nice folks, eh? So much for the vaunted "tolerance".

I wasn't going to bring the entire post over from the Cyber Pastor's blog at Townhall but I WILL because it needs to be here. What this particular post is about is self-explanatory and I will bring EVERY single comment on that thread and post them here, in the body of this post so ALL can see what THIS troll is all about.


Where I've Been and Where I'm Going

I've not made a new post on here since June 26th. Where have I been?

Well, it's like this: June was a very tough month for me personally. I attended 6 funerals, 2 of which I preached and the other 4 I went to support family, friends, or the pastor doing the funeral.

Some might say, don't you rejoice when people go to Heaven? My response is, "of course I do when I believe the person was ready". That being said, it doesn't mean that there is not mourning to do, and surprise, surprise - preachers mourn for people just like everyone else.

So Pastor Ed, you've taken a couple of weeks off to mourn???? Well, yes and no. I did need to lighten up just a little, but that isn't the only reason for not blogging for 2 weeks.

I am in the process of evaluating my purpose in blogging and seeking God's guidance for where to go from here. I believe that blogging can be a very good tool for ministry. I also believe that arguing with trolls, is not what I am called to do.

Also, with this process of evaluation, I am looking for a new site so that I can moderate comments myself. Call me self-righteous or whatever you like, but I will no longer have a site where people comment with rude, nasty, or hateful remarks. I don't blog to argue, I blog to do God's work, and motivate the Silent Majority to not allow satan to rule things in our great country.

This coming week my wife and I will be working at Teen Camp. The timing is good, as it gives me some more time to continue my evaluation. If you have comments or suggestions, I welcome them (if they are not rude, nasty, or hateful). Let me know, how is it that I can best minister to my online "congregation".

I love you all (Right or not), and say a prayer for us as we are with teenagers who will have the opportunity to change their lives for all eternity.

Pastor Ed

I'm going to post a link to the pictures from the funeral procession for the "Fallen Hero" who was buried here in our town, and I'm going to post something on the new Sermon Series I'm starting tomorrow.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Behold the comments. You tell me, in the comments section of this post which ones are conservatives and which ones are the moonbats. Some comments will be edited for content.

Groovy writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 7:31 AM My Cyber Pastor Wherever you go on the internet; I will follow. You're my Cyber Pastor and I ain't giving you up!! Throughout history, as technology has advanced, so too has God's word. Facing the morally perilous times that we are currently just at the beginning of combined with the ability to access the world in a few keystrokes; me thinks, as your screen name implies...your journey has already begun. And, I'm right here with ya. Please keep me updated on where your blog will be. Without you as my designated "net anchor" I'm quite sure I'd be totally lost in the blogosphere. :) :) I think of all the funerals Rudy Guiliani attended after 9/11. At one point I think he was attending 2-3 a day!! Loss of life is always tragic; yet, IMHO, death is always the ultimate confirmation of the life God has breathed into all of us.

solo writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 11:20 AM Pastor Ed "The war for men's souls is not over, yet are we weary of the battle." db Arguing with trolls serves no other purpose than to give them another tool to hammer conservatives with. Most often it is counter productive and a test of patience. That old adage, "You can lead a horse to water but ya can't make him drink" is fitting in this case. To say that I don't blame you would be an understatement but remember the words of Thomas Paine; " These are times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman." May God attend your weary soul and renew you in His spirit to continue the fight wherever that may be. Keep up the good fight Pastor. God bless you.

Roger writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 12:01 PM Moving on! Pastor Ed -- Thanks for sharing your burdens and thoughts! Those of us who care certainly understand something of the demands and drain on a pastor (and his family). And we also understand your frustration with the naysayers. Now, of all times, we need men and women of God who see and are able to verbalize the issues of the day. You have that ability with your blogs, just as I'm sure you do in your ministry of sharing God's message and love. So your decision to seek a new site to share is very wise, and important. We will be praying for you and your wife at Teen Camp -- a job that surely has demands, but also rewards. And we'll pray God continues to recharge the batteries and give you an even greater vision and enthusiasm for His work! Have a wonderful week with young people who need the loving touches and direction of a couple like you! Roger Metzger

Cassie writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 1:01 PM Our Blog Pastor I once described YOU as our blog Pastor so no matter where you go I'll be there. I'll pray that you & your wife will help those young people, I know you two can do it. I think Pastor you answered your own question: You blog to do God's work. God don't give us anything more than we can handle. And to me God gave us YOU as our Pastor so that You can lead us in God's words on here. To me no one can do that better than you. My love right back at you.

Guy Arthur Thomas writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 1:22 PM Move on tenderfoot Listen Ed, sincere or not you apparently are a tenderfoot and are so sensitive that the only response you can stomach are friendly applause. And frankly, that is the way of a child. Grown-ups should be able to either endure or ignore comments they find objectionable. Demanding people respond in a way that is tailored to your liking is at best narcissistic and generally reflects an acceptance of self-delusion. No one worth their salt runs from their critics. Your splitting because you can't take a few spicy comments is a liberal's method of arguing, in other words, "if everyone doesn't agree with me I am going to leave and go where everyone just cheers one another" like sycophants. But then that is the method and mentality of cultic types and you aren't like that....right?

Roger writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 1:36 PM Tenderfoot? I like pork. I've nurtured and produced pork. It doesn't mean I wallow with the swine!

Freedom Toast writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 5:46 PM Spicy Comments "...a few spicy comments is a liberal's method of arguing..." I have seen such behavior from all sides; and, if the commentor's views aren't in line with the blogger then they are labelled trolls or worse. It is unfortunate that sides become so polarized that a person is so convinced they are right, that anybody not agreeing must be by extension wrong, a troll, a commie, a liberal, a moron, etc. Why can't people comment and respond to advance a discussion? Your hero, RWR, was able to dialog with Gorby; and W invited Pootie-Poot to Daddy's house for a sleep over; so, if they can stand challenges to their ideas, so can you. Only teenagers know everything about everything. Adults realize that the more they learn, the more they realize what they don't know. And, what they don't know is greater than what they do know.

mommybrook writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 7:35 PM for my dad Has anyone ever noticed when ignorant people talk, they use big words to try to make themselves sound more intelligent? Maybe some people should reevaluate why they are even posting on here in the first place. Is it to make you feel better about putting down a good man, and a pastor, so you don't have to look at the planks in your own eyes???? Dad, you know wherever you go, I will follow. I love you!!!

Cassie writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 9:42 PM A Pastor's right Hello Brook and yes I do notice the big words. I guess I have to ask how they come up with these conclusions. It seems every democrat has freedoms but let a Republican do it and that is a no no. We all know what's going on. Can't help that the democrats don't.

Tom writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 9:47 PM Interesting Hey Ed. Thought I would get out here to see what all is going on. I haven't been on line for a while. Looks like this Blog stuff sure does bring out the inner person of some folks. Both Christian and Heathen. May God Bless you at camp. Tom

Cassie writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 9:55 PM We're not diplomats Oh and Guy the name is Pastor Ed to you. I'm not a diplomat and never wanted to anyway, but because RWR spoke with Gorby and Bush with I forget who, that is their jobs. We the taxpayer expects it from them. But us this is a blog, and this blog here is run by a wonderful, kindhearted man who don't deserve your critical musings.

solo writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 11:53 PM Pastor Ed As is usual, the lefties must get their arrogant musings in. This is your blog and you have the right to moderate any comment(s) you choose. Some of the past comments by left wing agitators were completely out of line and as I stated above counterproductive. Debating is one thing but the use of foul language in some of the past comments by left wing nuts is absolutely unacceptable. TownHall.com does not allow the blog owner to moderate so moving on is perfectly understandable. Enjoy your time off sir. Most of us will be looking forward to your new digs wherever that might be. You lefties have your own blogs so go there...and stay.

Liberty Card writes: Monday, July, 09, 2007 12:39 AM By Your Enemies They Shall Know You Paster Ed, You know my religious convictions. Yet for some reason we have connected. Do not be bothered by the insults and taunts of these crackpots. I know you are willing to discuss IDEAS, but to fend off insults and ad hominem attacks only drags you down, which is what the enemy wants. I am honored to be your Brother In Christ, and I (along with several others) will always have your back. God bless you Bro'. Soldier on.

SFBert writes: Monday, July, 09, 2007 12:52 AM Moving On Pastor Ed, The Lefties aren't going to change. Their attitude is no different from the gang-bangers I have dealt with since the first of the year --" I got rights!!!!". That's the first squeal outta their mouths. But they don't accept their responsibilities. And they don't recognize that what they do on our blogs is the digital equivalent of drive-by shootings, graffiti, and extortion. Extortion? Yes, extortion. In the broadest sense, they decry what is happening in Iraq, but they don't see themselves as being the equivalent of electronic terrorists. They do not add to the discussion, they are there to disrupt the discourse. They offer nothing but hate, name calling, and criticism. And it is clear from their writing that they have been no where and have learned nothing. The ministry does not call to them. They cannot be changed anymore than we can change the nature of Jihadists. They are what they are and no amount of negotiating will make them behave or go away. And all we have to counter them is words which don't have the effect necessary to make them behave. And like the hard-core terrorist, if you set up a blog and don't pass the word where it is securely, they will be on it because that is what they do. I don't mean to sound cynical about those folks, but there's no changing their nature. And efforts to pass on experience and knowledge are pretty useless because they are not there to engage in dialogue, they are there instead to badger. For instance at our military blog, we now require vetting to get on it. No passing the background check, no getting on it. Reason being is that some folks got on it who pretended to be Iraq war vets and were found to be some leftists from the University at Wisconsin. None had ever served and so re-starting with a vetting process has worked greatly in improving the quality of discourse on it. What leftists don't understand about free speech is that the Bill of Rights protects it from the government. What the Bill or Rights does not do is guarantee that it can be excercised in private forums. Anyway, count me in on the next iteration of you blog.

Jimmy Carter writes: Monday, July, 09, 2007 12:59 AM I'll chime in too... ...a sign of your effectiveness is the reaction of your opposition. Never quit. Never give up. You obviously bring out the other side. That proves you are effective. Feel Free to take a respite from time to time, but DO NOT EVER GIVE IN TO THE OPPOSITION. EVER. Also, I don't like to admit, but if you don't like the comments, you can always turn them off and still spread The Word. Godspeed.

Seymour Bush writes: Wednesday, July, 11, 2007 6:06 PM SOB... Don't leave Eddy, please don't leave. It's so much fun picking you apart and showing you for what you really are, a fraud or wolf in sheep's clothing.

Seymour Bush writes: Wednesday, July, 11, 2007 6:08 PM Twisted logic Jimmy Carter writes: Monday, July, 09, 2007 12:59 AM I'll chime in too... ...a sign of your effectiveness is the reaction of your opposition. Well homey, according to YOUR logic bush is the greatest president that ever lived. LOL

Seymour Bush writes: Wednesday, July, 11, 2007 6:10 PM Mommy dearest.. mommybrook writes: Sunday, July, 08, 2007 7:35 PM for my dad Has anyone ever noticed when ignorant people talk, they use big words to try to make themselves sound more intelligent? Your comment is self refuting. I won't explain that one but will say that we use 'big' words (more than 5 letters) because most of us are more educated than many of you. And, from what I can see (pictures, comments, etc.) from your ilk, you seem to be of the lower classes in this country. Not that I have anything against that but merely stating the obvious.

Seymour Bush writes: Wednesday, July, 11, 2007 6:27 PM Hurrah! Barbara Boxer: "Impeachment should be on the table" - Ed Schultz Show 7/11/07 source: buzzflash.com It's about time! First him then the twin brother of Jesus - bush. Email It | Print It | Flag as Offensive

Cassie writes: Wednesday, July, 11, 2007 7:08 PM Congress sucks eggs Raoul, Why don't you grow a brain? And old boxer car barb needs to get with it, no one in congress is doing anything well maybe boxer & teddy have a stool together. I'll tell you what they are doing wasting time & money with all their powers of deductions on "meetings". Phoney bolonga's that they are. If a Republicans sneezes the fat dems want to know how, when, where, & why didn't I know first. The Stupid SOB's.

Seymour Bush writes: Wednesday, July, 11, 2007 7:25 PM For Cass. OH but the problem is that I DO have a brain. This is why I have such a hard time trying to figure all of you out in light of what we have seen during the past few months regarding bush and company. With all the truth finally coming out about the corrupt ways of his ilk and yet all of you still fawn over him! Well, like they say - follow the leader no matter what. Just like Hitler in the bunker during the last days - all of you will go down with him no matter what. What a sorry lot you are. You are to be pitied like a rabid dog.

Seymour Bush writes: Wednesday, July, 11, 2007 8:03 PM Al Queda on the run? How many times have we heard that the enemy is in retreat and that 75% of their top leadership has been killed or captured? I've lost count. And yet just today our own intelligence personnel have admitted that al Queda strength is back to pre 9/11 strength. Could it be that bush and company have lied about this like everything else? Say it ain't so Jesus, say it ain't so!

Cassie writes: Wednesday, July, 11, 2007 11:52 PM Brain for raoul Oh raoul do I need to explain everything to you? I don't fold for anyone and you know it. BUT, when it comes to the GWOT I will support Bush and you know that too. It's not like the dems are coming up roses, all they do is have hearings, and hearings about hearings. And this to you is doing something????? I know YOU have a brain or whatever but it would be nice once in awhile if you'd use it. How's BooBoo?

Seymour Bush writes: Thursday, July, 12, 2007 6:31 AM Try to comment for once Cass, Please look right above your last comment here to what I wrote about Al Queda's increased strength and the lies bush told us about them being on the run. And then, if possible, comment on that and ONLY that. Are you capable of doing so without making boring speeches?

Cassie writes: Thursday, July, 12, 2007 12:36 PM Just the facts raoul, Where are you getting your info from? I know -fact: we haven't been hit again. fact: some AQ are dead or imprisoned. fact: our Troops are getting a lot of help from Iraqi citizens who turn AQ in. fact: our Troops have found lots of cashes, lots of ammo, bombs, etc. I'm not here to amuse you, I'm not here to satisfy you. If your bored find another place.

Seymour Bush writes: Thursday, July, 12, 2007 2:30 PM I cannot believe it! Oh Madison, where are you? I need to apologize for defending this nutcase over at the GOP blog. Where am I getting my info from? How about EVERY freakin news source in America? What about our own CIA analysts in Washington who were quoted in the AP News? Are you THAT freakin deluded and living in a bubble just like bush? And lastly (and believe me, this is my last note to YOU since you are obviously out of it) - we haven't been hit again so I guess it means bush is doing the job. What about Aug/2001 when he was warned about the FIRST freakin hit coming on 9/11? Don't answer - you simply are incapable of it. And to think that the other ahole, rev. boston used to give you kudos for 'really giving it to the lefties'. All you give is deluded bs about supporting the troops, etc. You are totally nuts just like most of the other nutjobs over here.

Cassie writes: Thursday, July, 12, 2007 5:52 PM Toad not man Now YOU listen to me raoul, you have about as much d@mn courtesy as a mudworm in heat. AND I NEVER ASKED YOU to defend me. D@mn it your an idiot, a jackazz, and without a doubt one of the biggest horse's end's I ever met on a blog. I'm a nujob, hahaha- you raoul are a jihadist pig that happens to be a nazi commie ---hole. Oh I can dish it out when I choose to, and from now on you better find yourself another place to hang out. I'm asking all to get you off their blogs in the name of blog ethics. Not for me, I could care less what you yap about. I know facts and fact is your nothing but a toad trying to be a man.

forty-two writes: Sunday, July, 15, 2007 11:33 PM Reply to Guy Arthur Thomas: First of all, take a grammar class. 2nd, re-read the post. It clearly explains the reasoning for the decision. 3rd, "spicey is a liberal's method of arguing"??? Does that remark actually make sense to you? It is "cultic" that the pastor does not feel God has called him to argue with trolls? You seem to have a condescending view of people who do not like rudeness, hatefulness and nastiness. I suppose those are attributes you are proud to display to the world and that is your choice. But if people choose to step out of the way of your comments you should respect that choice as well. As far as running from critics....well Christianity is criticized continually and you are talking about a guy who LITERALLY wears his Christianity as a part of his everyday clothing so I'm not sure how you base that remark.

Cassie writes: Monday, July, 16, 2007 12:13 AM Splitting hairs If splitting is the way of a child then can I assume that goes for the ones that want to retreat? I'm tired of whiners like you Guy.