~Snooper~

As you all know, we here at ANO will not let this subject die off as the Obama Camp would like. We have been receiving comments here and there and posts have been made in rebuttal but have vanished before I could memorialize them via screen shots.

However, at The American Thinker, there are two articles, one written by Thomas Lifson on 17 JUL 08 entitled, Another inconvenient truth down the Obama Memory Hole and one written by Lee Cary on 20 JUL 08 entitled, Obama's Civilian National Security Force. Thomas Lifson expresses the same concerns that we do and a host of others and Lee Cary has the closest and most palatable "explaining away" scenario as to what Barack actually meant that I have seen to date.

I do have one correction, however. In the Thomas Lifson piece, he mentions that WND "broke the story" which is in error. I wish that I could say that ANO broke the story but, we did not. We are merely picking up the Guidon that was dropped and carrying on forward into battle. Actually, in our first post here, one will find the only two that I know of that spoke of this before we did. Our first post on this was 09 JUL 08 (I originally read the story at AARP forum on 07 JUL 08). Exurban League was the first followed by Little Green Footballs. The running list of others since are listed in previous posts, chronicled at the end of this post.

Regardless, the Lee Cary piece states that all Barack's verbiage is nothing to be concerned about in regards to the Obama Youth conundrum but the words he spoke are potentially ominous and will have far-reaching affects on the tax collections required to carry this out. That is all fine and dandy but his body language in the video says something else all together. Until Barack Hussein Obama comes forth and explains this out in the open and not through one of his campaign flunkies (spokesman) in his own non teleprompter mannerisms will I begin to not suspect his Marxist Ideologies shining through - on the cuff. In part:

[...] The entire plan is breathtaking in its scope. But it does not, as at least one internet writer has suggested, portend a "giant police force." It would be easier to rebut if it did. As it is, it's silly stuff born of naively fanciful dreams.

Senator Obama aims to tap into the already active volunteerism of millions of Americans and recruit them to become cogs in a gigantic government machine grinding out his social re-engineering agenda. It's Orwellian-like, with a novice social activist's mentality at the helm. ... [...]

To me, these two paragraphs contradict. It may be my imagination running away with myself but I don't think so. The "silly stuff born of naively fanciful dreams" in one paragraph followed by "It's Orwellian-like, with a novice social activist's mentality at the helm" statement is a portent in and of itself.

Either way, whether it be a Civilian National Security Force equipped, just as powerful, just as strong and just as well funded as the United States Armed Forces or a gigantic play-pen for young people, the tax burden will be astronomical in scope. Both scenarios should be bringing down the roofs across America with a hearty "WHAT THE HELL IS HE TALKING ABOUT NOW!" sentiment.

Again, when I listen to the audio clips and then view the video paying close attention to the body language, methinks he doesn't want a play-pen for young people. The man is a Marxist-Communist the likes Mark and Engles would be proud of, let alone Saul Alinsky. In the same topical paragraph in his speech, he talked about increasing military strength by nearly 92,000 Troops and creating an equally expansive Civilian Force.

Lee Cary wrote a great article but I'm not buying it. Not yet.

Our friend x_dhimmi (deb) made us a video of the section of the main video in question. Watch his body language. All through the nearly 25-minute video, this is the only time his tonal inflections rose to the peek in which it did as he leaned into the microphone when he berated the military like he did. Nope. Not buying the Lee Cary piece at all.

We Live In Upside Down Land
The Obama Youth: What's Next?
Barack's Civilian Army Just Keeps Getting More and More Interesting

Obama Youth: The Lame Stream Deafly Silent

The Obama Youth: The Saga Continues
Obama Youth: The Gift That Keeps On Taking

.

I don't blame Pat Dollard one bit. But, who is Pat Dollard anyway? Well, go here and find out.

Some time ago I penned a few posts and within those posts I expressed the thought and opinion that the Democrat Party leadership (the CONgress Critters) and their cohorts and fellow conspirators within the Republican Party leadership were directly responsible for the deaths and wounding of American and Coalition Forces fighting both in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I have performed a lengthy study on my own volition and although I am not ready to publish the entire chronologically correct tome, I did in fact find a correlation. And, I have confirmed that the political leaders in the very dishonorable halls of CONgress, in their quest of and for power and control of all things in this nation, have contributed directly to the losses of life in a combat zone. Not all but more than half. I also found that the war, at least in Iraq, would have been over and that which we are witnessing in Iraq today, could have been realized in early 2007 or late to mid-2006. But, there was an election to be won and that is all that mattered to the Leftinistra - damn them all.

In a previous post: From an Army Rangers' Mouth About Iraq

[...] ... know this. I despise the likes of Nancy Pelosi. Taking it a few steps further, I actually hate her and would not bemoan her demise - from natural causes, naturally.

In more recent posts, I have called for the investigation in regards to the deaths of American Troops both in Iraq and Afghanistan which can be directly attributed to the defaming and blind hatred of President Bush and our Troops by the likes of Nancy Pelosi. She is the ring leader in the Lower House, after all and it is within her power to stop the nonsense. I have conducted a specific investigation of my own and there is a direct correlation to the spikes in attacks on American and Coalition forces fighting in this war. One of those spikes resulted in Spain removing their forces from Iraq which was repaid by yet another terrorist attack in Spain as a heart-felt thank you to Spain from Al Qaida.

Anyone within the construct of government service which conducts themselves such as Nancy Pelosi and her similar ilk in regards to this war, that, by the way, they all signed onto, are a disgrace to this nation and by the very definitions of treason, subversion and sedition, an investigation is in order and charges are required to be levied.

The Army Ranger that has originally called into a radio broadcast show was killed in action fighting a war Pelosi approved of in the first place. Thank you Nancy et al for prolonging this war and contributing to the deaths of the men and women that protect you and thank you Nancy et all for contributing to the deaths of my Brothers In Arms. May you rot in hell. The blood on your hands will never wash away. [...]

In this post entitled, Pelosi IS Guilty of Killing American Troops and Innocent Iraqi Civilians, we hear Nancy Pelosi herself thanking the government in Iran for, in essence, killing our Troops in and around Iraq. After all, it was Iran that has brought about the peace we are seeing now. (NOTE: our friend x_dhimmi (deb) made a You Tube video of Her Stretchness.)

In this post entitled, A Victory In Iraq Equates To A Defeat To Pelosi, one will find these quotes:

[...] Expect Pelosi to continue her efforts to discredit our military, since an American victory on the battlefield amounts to a Pelosi defeat at home. [...]

[...] So why any thoughtful American with any common sense would continue to support or vote for today's Democratic Party is beyond me. [...]

[...] Thinking as far back as the Eisenhower administration, I don't remember any politician, on either side of the aisle, hating America and praising the enemy as much as Pelosi does. [...]

[...] Once again, the Democrats prove that the word "Democrat" is synonymous with "traitor." Pelosi is the latest Democrat to verge on committing treason.

Her comments about Iran prove that Democrats do indeed hate the military and their country.

What other conclusion can you come up with when she praises Iran, but not Gen. David Petraeus? [...]

As the nation is ravaged by rising fuel costs across the country; as the approval ratings of the DNC led CONgress plummet like an F4 with dual engine failures; as each and every Leftinistra "program" and thought process is proven to be dismal failures; instead of accepting the personal and professional responsibility that adults would do for their own shortcomings, what does Nancy do? She blames President Bush and the Republican Party.

I said all of the above at the risk of repeating myself to acknowledge that I am not the only one that feels the way I do. Below are screen shots that I took earlier today with the sole purpose of raking the scab off of an old would that will not heal.

This screen shot was taken from this page. When you go there or click the image to enlarge it, you will find this caption: "Humvee blown up by Al Qaeda, Barack Hussein Obama and the rest of the Democrat Party, and the American Media. 2 KIA, 2 wounded." Pat Dollard was in this vehicle. He was wounded in this vehicle. He fought his way back to this vehicle. He crawled his way back to this vehicle with broken leg and other wounds. He was blown OUT of this vehicle by an IED. He isn't happy that Barack Obama is visiting the Troops because Barack Obama doesn't deserve to be in the presence of the Troops. "As I was flying through the sky, instead of being in a blackout as I should be, my mind was a perfectly focused computer: I realized that Conley had stepped directly onto a bomb, I realized he was dead, and I hoped as I landed that my wounds would not be so bad, and that I indeed might even survive. And somehow, I was able to wonder why I was completely free of the shock that 95% of the others told me they experienced. I wondered why I was so locked into the reality of what was happening."

This screen shot was taken from this page. There is another picture that I took a screen shot of on that same page and for a particular reason an d I will explain shortly. However, when enlarge the image, you will find the proper sentiment. He ends his sentiment as we at A Newt One have often expressed in no uncertain terms: "We have serious work to do here at home."

We have an electorate that has been brainwashed into believing that Democrats are Republicans and Republicans are Democrats. They are being taught this in our schools and colleges across this nation. I met hundreds of them in my quest across Michigan. I was astounded and flabbergasted. The indoctrination of impressionable youths in our schools is unconscionable. It is unacceptable and it is our fault - the movers and shakers of the Conservative Movement. We have fallen down and we cannot get back up. Shame on us and shame on the Conservative leaders in CONgress for being the cowards they have turned out to be. Now, for the last screen shot. Pay attention.

Again, this was taken of this page. It took me approximately .0000001 nano-seconds to discover the "problem" presented in this image. A basic student of body language will pick it out immediately. Those that know nothing of body language will miss it totally and will be lost in the discussion.

So, for those of you that see it, please let us know what you see in the comments section of this post. Either enlarge the image or visit the web site. In case you are wondering, more than likely, the cause for Pat's rant in the caption for the photo just above this one, is due to what he also noticed.

Yes, we have some serious work to do. But, do we have leaders that will do that which needs to be done? Are we going to wait for someone else to do it or, are we going to take the bull by the horns and do it ourselves?

As for me, I am way ahead of most so, watch my smoke.

~Snooper~

Thank you ever so kindly x_dhimmi (deb) for another fine video. The below video is a work still in progress but I thought to get this version up and running. For email subscribers, go here to view and vote.

HT Spree...



WOW

That is all

~Snooper~

The post below is a previous post from 23 JAN 08. I am reposting this because it was brought up in the chat room on my ATW afternoon show on TOCB. Not only that, it has been brought to my attention that the Indoctrination Nazis in our colleges across this nation are teaching this crap as truth when it has been shown to be a complete lie oozing from the Anti-Americanists indoctrinating our "yoots". When will this kind of unacceptable behavior stop? When the Conservatives get off of their lazy asses and act on this.

False Pretenses

Following 9/11, President Bush and seven top officials of his administration waged a carefully orchestrated campaign of misinformation about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


SIGH. Here we go again with the old and tired bull-hockeys. I have concluded that evidence beforehand doesn't matter to the BDS crowd. For those that have laid claim that President George W Bush is the dumbest man in the world, I find it interesting that such a Big Dummy could orchestrate and pull off such a stunt with all of the hatred being directed towards the man for stealing the election away from Al Gore.

CBS says that they have breaking news but this isn't breaking news. It is the same old garbage that has been debunked and disproved for at least 3 or 5 years now but the Leftinistra, having been beat up for the past 7 years by the Big Dummy on a regular basis and over every issue, just hate him so bad that facts don't matter to these idiots.

We now have a report that claims:

President George W. Bush and seven of his administration's top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Nearly five years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, an exhaustive examination of the record shows that the statements were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses. [...]

Interesting.

[...] It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to Al Qaeda. This was the conclusion of numerous bipartisan government investigations, including those by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (2004 and 2006), the 9/11 Commission, and the multinational Iraq Survey Group, whose "Duelfer Report" established that Saddam Hussein had terminated Iraq's nuclear program in 1991 and made little effort to restart it. [...]

Really.

[...] In addition to their patently false pronouncements, Bush and these seven top officials also made hundreds of other statements in the two years after 9/11 in which they implied that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or links to Al Qaeda. Other administration higher-ups, joined by Pentagon officials and Republican leaders in Congress, also routinely sounded false war alarms in the Washington echo chamber. [...]

I see.

The theoretical "search" criteria is here and the theoretical "parameters" are here. I found these collection of words perplexing and misleading...would they be lies, then?

[...] Direct false statements. False statements by the eight Bush administration officials were counted as "direct" - and included in the total count of false statements - when they specifically linked Iraq to Al Qaeda or referenced Iraq's contemporaneous possession, possible possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction (chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons). In addition, any use of the verb "disarm" was categorized as a direct statement because of the literal meaning of the word. (Example: "Saddam Hussein has got a choice, and that is, he can disarm.") These false statements can be found within the passages that are highlighted in yellow in the project database. Indirect false statements. Statements were classified as "indirect" if they did not specifically link Iraq to Al Qaeda but alleged, for example, that Iraq supported or sponsored terrorism or terrorist organizations, or if they referred to Iraq's former possession of weapons of mass destruction or used such general phrases, for example, as "dangerous weapons." These indirect false statements are not included in the total count of 935.

They wouldn't "directly" lie, would they? And, they even have pictures!


Such a pretty picture it is, too! Thank God for Crayola Crayons! They get an A+ and 15 Gold Stars! Their Mommies must be very proud of them! And, you just have GOT to love this...

[...] Short of such review, this project provides a heretofore unavailable framework for examining how the U.S. war in Iraq came to pass. Clearly, it calls into question the repeated assertions of Bush administration officials that they were the unwitting victims of bad intelligence.

Above all, the 935 false statements painstakingly presented here finally help to answer two all-too-familiar questions as they apply to Bush and his top advisers: What did they know, and when did they know it?

WOW! Nothing like being about 2 years behind the times there, Skippies! The only difference I see here is that in this report, they were counting via 'rithmetic. I wonder how their reading and 'riting is...

Check out their Staff and see if you see what I see. Bill Buzenberg is the Chief Top Dog. The Board of Directors is here. The Advisory Board is here. A small blurb on the Founder is here. Having recognized several of the folks listed in the links above, I find the report wanting in substance and can guarantee the politics of each of them has contributed to this report and there is nothing unbiased in this report. On top of that, the NY Slimes endorses the "project"...go figure. And, adding insult to injury - self inflicted - check out the Funders here.

I know that I am a lowly blogger and all and a Citizen Journalist but I can read and I know that I have had EVERY single one of these arguments in one form or another for a long time now with many people. This report is designed to distract from the fact that the Leftinistra have been wrong all along and they know it. This report will merely incite the already emotionally and psychologically weak moonbats, libtards and other anti-Americanist groups all atwitter to distract from the issues at hand - meaning the elections.

I have read this study and a good portion of the methodology and it lacks integrity. As usual, there is no "smoking gun" proof of any of the allegations, meaning, there is no substantiation. In regards to the WMDs, especially, they obviously have been locked in a closet someplace. Also, there is no evidence that the alleged "false statements" were purposefully stated knowing them to be false at the time they were uttered. I love hind-sight investigations, if this can be called an investigation.

How soon people forget, either on purpose or suffering from a mental condition with short and long term memory dysfunction. Surely they have read the Iraq War Resolution...yes? Therein, one can see that in a prewar discussion, all possible scenarios were discussed and agreed upon.

In the Iraq War Resolution, it was stipulated that Iraq had violated 17 United Nations Resolutions and had not provided proof that Iraq had destroyed their WMD stockpiles and equipment. Saddam had proven to the world that his word could not be trusted and the Cease Fire of 1991 was withdrawn.

Another obvious element is that this group was not allowed out of their closets and were not allowed to read the ISG. Enough said about that one.

No one can convince humans capable of rational though t that this report isn't biased one bit. Had they honestly carried out their research, they would have found this:

~Snooper~

Col Day was a fellow POW with John McCain and he just so happens to be the highest decorated veteran in America. He, like the lads here at A Newt One take no prisoners and do not fear ridicule or the slanderous tripe from the Moonbat Fruit Loop Brigades that are systematically destroying this nation. (major HT to Gateway Pundit once again)

Today, the Colonel took note and stood up to express himself and told the truth about the threats we as a nation face. Naturally, the truth is so repelling that the Moonbat Fruit Loop Brigades soiled their fragile undies. Here is what he had to say and God bless you Sir!

"The Muslims have said either we kneel or they're going to kill us. I don't intend to kneel and I don't advocate to anybody that we kneel, and John doesn't advocate to anybody that we kneel."

And that is the absolute truth. The Leftinistra will not accept this fact as so expressed hundreds of times not just from us but from the Jihadi scum themselves. I'll not belabor the points and rhetoric of the Jihadim for the Leftinistra. They have heard the Jihadis say that they will dominate the USA and Britain by 2050 so there is no point in, for the Nth time, placing the quoted verbiage in this post. With that said, if one wants to view the threats the world faces from Islamic Jihad, the evidence - the overwhelming evidence - is right here under the heading of Global Cultural Jihad.

The would be First Czar of the United States would have us all kneel and begin talking with an enemy that has declared a plethora of fatwahs against this nation. In addition, they have shown willingness and resolve to carry out the instructions and edicts within those declared fatwahs. Barack Obama would, just unlike the old Terryton commercials of bygone days, switch rather than fight. Our enemies do not want to talk. As for myself, I'd "Rather" fight than switch and I shall not kneel before a false "god" named "allah" under any circumstances.

Nor shall I bow before lord stumpy obama.

One of my favorite lines in the movie industry came from the movie the Good, Bad and Ugly: "If you're going to shoot, shoot. Don't talk." Barack is a coward's coward. He visits the troops in Iraq when it is safe for him to do so and he is hailed as a conquering hero from his pathetic following. John McCain visits during a time when there are combat operations in process and he is considered a war mongerer. Go figure.

Barack Obama is a fraud and a liar and I pretty much covered his idiocy, disingenuousness and cowardice in this previous post entitled Sith Lord Obama and His Civilian National Security Force. In no less than ten issues, he has not only flip-flopped on them, he has made John F'n Kerry look like the Rock of Gibraltar in steadfastness and solid stance. Say what you want about John McCain...he is no coward and he, for the most part, understands the threats we face (he does have to learn the totality of that threat). He fully understands that supporting the Troops also requires supporting their Mission.

Although John McCain has indeed fallen to the woes and idiocies of political correctness, at least he takes a stand and sticks with it and doesn't flow with the wind. He may have a bad temper but I'd "Rather" have a bad-tempered former POW that has been there and done that than a cowardly twit with no record of having what it takes to get the job done, as in lord stumpy obama.

When John McCain "is caught" in a "change of mind", at least he finishes his waffle, takes his lumps and moves on. lord stumpy obama? He denies he ever said anything differently than what he is saying at the moment. He is a fraud. He is a coward. He is a fool.

John McCain may be a lot of things that many of us like and many of us cannot tolerate or accept. That is fully understandable. I like quite a few things about John McCain and there are some things that John McCain says and believes that drives me absolutely bone chillingly mad. But, then, I come to the realization that there will never be the perfect candidate but there will always be the perfect storm. That perfect storm is the coward and fraud, lord stumpy obama.

John McCain or President Bush has not once even remotely considered having a Civilian National Security Force comprised of kids - children - students - within the AmeriCorp and the Peace Corps elements that will be just as strong - just as powerful - just as well funded - as the United States Armed Forces. Had they ever uttered such stupidity either via a gaffe or a moment of pandering, the Lame Stream Media and the Moonbat Fruit Loop Brigades would be screaming holy hell - if there is such a thing as holy hell. There would be vehement calls for a steady round of relentless investigations into the character and intent of these anti-Americanists that dared usurp the authority of the United States Armed Services and the Law Enforcement Agencies across this great nation. Yet, lord stumpy obama gets a free pass and his sycophants say that he was merely reiterating his plan for diplomats and other such nonsense. I say nonsense because diplomats - or as I call them, wimplomats - wither before and American Fighting Man or Woman...there is no comparison.

And no, lord stumpy obama cannot hold a candle to the lowest of Privates, Sailors and Airmen that have served this Nation, currently serving this Nation nor those that will serve this Nation.

Plainly stated, lord stumpy obama doesn't have what it takes to lead the Free World. His very role models prove it.

We Live In Upside Down Land
The Obama Youth: What's Next?
Barack's Civilian Army Just Keeps Getting More and More Interesting

Obama Youth: The Lame Stream Deafly Silent

The Obama Youth: The Saga Continues
Obama Youth: The Gift That Keeps On Taking

.

McCain Campaign Ad...can this be the beginning we have been DEMANDING of McCain?

~Snooper~

On 02 JUL 08 in Colorado Springs, CO, the would be next POTUS Obama delivered a speech rife with empty platitudes and useless rhetoric. It was more feigned aplomb to an audience easily swayed with pretty talk void of substance.

However, there has been detected an ominous gaffe or a purposeful ad lib from being surrounded by supporters falling all over and prostrating themselves before a man that has accomplished nothing in his life on his own volition either in business or politically. His Illinois public service is nothing but a black hole of either disinformation, misinformation or right out missing information. I, for one, cannot trust a politician whose political record is held in secret or non existent.

Who is this man, Barack? Does anyone know? I'm not talking about the one we all hear and see as he parades himself before the cameras and teleprompters. We know what he is when we see and hear him but, who is he really? And, to add insult to injury, why is it that every time he is caught in a major gaffe or a lie, his web site is expunged and cleared of all damaging evidence?

In his speech which can be viewed here or at his official web site (before it is either edited or deleted), Barack is heard to say the following (among other things):

[...] "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." [...]

Taken out of context, the Worry Alarms begin to wail. However, taken in context, the Worry Alarms cannot be heard or detected due to the Tornado Klaxons across the nation are wailing. The quote above can be heard at time stamp 16:35 and 17:10, approximately a little over half way through the video. In case one doesn't want to view the video, the audio capture can be heard here.

The portent of his words emphasized as they are in the video but cannot be found in his prepared speech, is not only ominous but frighteningly spooky. To fully understand the verbiage of what has become known as the beginning of The Obama Youth Brigades, one must fully view the nearly 24 minute video (if it hasn't been edited yet). In conjunction with that, one must at least try and understand what he means exactly by his mantra of Hope and Change that not one single person has been able to viably explain to its fullest intent.

Barack has also been heard to say in this same video the following:

[...] "Loving your country shouldn't just mean fireworks on the 4th of July. Loving your country must mean accepting your responsibility to do your part to change it. If you do, your life will be richer, our country will be stronger." [...]

That sounds pretty and noble. However, parsing the verbiage along with studying the body language including the tonal inflections - self emphasis of certain phrases - one discovers even more ominous and potentially threatening overtures. Where has the world heard these words of "your life will be richer, our country will be stronger" before? The intent and the verbiage, to the historian, sounds familiar.

Think back to the Hitler Youth and the Brown Shirts. Think back to the Black Shirts of the avant-garde of Italy's Mussolini. Think back to the now defunct USSR and the Red Chinese. They all spoke of the same ideology of "your life will be richer, our country will be stronger" and utilized the impressionable and indoctrinated youth of their society and time.

What are the changes that Barack hopes to make for and to the United States? How is he going to finance these grand schemes and noble plans that dreams are made of...and nightmares? What became of such governments and tyrannical and dictatorial regimes that espoused such changes and decrying "your life will be richer, our country will be stronger"? By whose estimations will our lives be richer and our country stronger? History reminds us and tells us that such regimes, in the end, failed and fell hard never to re-emerge from the quagmire, self-induced, of such magnitude that it is a wonder that one would even think of re-inventing that ugliness.

Think about the alleged "radical Islam" proponents that run to and fro reeking havoc among the population terrorizing the people and demanding devotion and loyalty...or else. What would Barack's Civilian National Security Forces be utilized for and what would their mission be? What are his plans for the nations' police forces? What are his plans for the FBI? Aren't the law enforcement agencies of this nation responsible for National Security on the Homefront? Why is Barack opining and announcing plans for a Civilian National Security Force? To what end?

So many questions and to date, not one single answer. World Net Daily has been frantically trying to ascertain answers or at least clarifications of Barack's uncanny comments. So eerie this is indeed. Barack's campaign has scrubbed these comments from the prepared speech and these same comments cannot be found on his web site either. Why is that? His web site does mention developing a Homeland Security Force but, as usual, the blandness and vagaries are ominously usual.

As Nazi Germany's Hitler used the Brown Shirts and the Hitler Youth as his personal guard, eyes and ears; as Mussolini did the same with his Black Shirts and the USSR did the same with the KGB, is this what Barack has planned? The answer might lie within his own uttered words and yes, Barack, words do mean something.

In his speech he said that he was going to increase the military by approx 65,000 Soldiers and 27,000 Marines. In the same breath or nearly so, he mentions an increase of 75,000 AmeriCorps workers to 250,000 and doubling the size of the Peace Corps of which, they will be on an equal par with the United States Armed Forces. Here is the quote once more:

[...] "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." [...]

The "relying only on our military" comment needs to be explained. And, having a civilian security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded" needs to be explained. The United States Armed Forces have a budget of $500 Billion with a population of nearly 3 Million. Barack's proposal will have an additional 92,000 Troops in conjunction with nearly 500 Thousand civilian national security forces of which will be just as strong, powerful and funded. Where is he going with this? Is his 500 thousand strong civilian national security force going to be on a budget of $500 Billion? "Just as well funded" sounds like it to me.

In recent times, we have heard the members of the Leftinistra say that our military is already too big yet he wants to increase its size. In recent times, we have heard the Leftinistra say that the government is tool big yet Barack wants to have the largest Federal Employee Payroll in the history of this nation.

This could also lead to the largest voter base for the government hand-out recipients ever conceived - purchased votes as it were by awarding a government job to a loyal subject. In his speech he invoked the names of FDR, John F Kennedy and Martin Luther King, two of which he doesn't even come close to being molded after, especially Martin Luther King because he was a registered Republican. JFK was the last Conservative Democrat. FDR on the other hand was a socialist that knew the powers of persuasion and threats to stay in power...he served 31/2 terms as President. Do recall that FDR wanted to stack the court and eventually did to get his New Deal (Raw Deal) into place.

No. Barack Hussein Obama has some explaining to do and we shall not cease and desist until we have answers.

Vote it up at Digital Journal please.